Non-word reading test vs anaesthesia. How do anaesthetised patients decode the contents without referring to the meaning?

Simple item record

Full item record

dc.contributor.authorPłotek, Włodzimierz
dc.contributor.authorCybulski, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorŁockiewicz, Marta
dc.contributor.authorBogdanowicz, Marta
dc.contributor.authorKluzik, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGrześkowiak, Małgorzata
dc.contributor.authorDrobnik, Leon
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-12T10:44:06Z
dc.date.available2016-10-12T10:44:06Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to examine the phonological functioning (reading speed and accuracy) of hospital patients under general anaesthesia administered during colonoscopy. Methods: In this study the ‘Łatysz’ non-word reading test was used to measure the impact of selected anaesthetics on the phonological aspect of language processing (defined as decoding without referring to the meaning) in a group of 22 anaesthetised patients compared to 23 non-anaesthetised patients from university clinics. Results: Compared to the preoperative performance, a decrease in reading accuracy and reading speed was observed only in the Anaesthesia Group — AG (in the subjects aged ≥ 35 years) 1.5 h after the administration of anaesthetics. Postoperatively, the AG were significantly slower and less accurate than the Control Group — CG — after 1.5 h. After 3 h, the AG had regained their baseline values both in reading accuracy and reading speed. During the last assessment session, the AG pronounced 82% of the words correctly, while the CG pronounced 74% correctly. Moreover, subjects aged ≥ 35 years performed worse than younger subjects in their reading accuracy and speed. Conclusions: The patients who underwent colonoscopy under general anaesthesia manifested impaired phonological functioning shortly after the procedure, both in the speed and accuracy of reading non-words. However, the accuracy problems subsided relatively quickly.pl_PL
dc.description.epersonMarcin Cybulski
dc.identifier.citationPlotek, W., Cybulski, M., Łockiewicz, M., Bogdanowicz, M., Kluzik, A., Grześkowiak, M. & Drobnik, L. (2014). Non-word reading test vs anaesthesia. How do anaesthetised patients decode the contents without referring to the meaning?. Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 3(46), 139-144. 10.5603/AIT.2014.0026.
dc.identifier.issn0209–1712
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/10558
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherVia Medicapl_PL
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek
dc.subjectanaesthesiapl_PL
dc.subjectanaestheticspl_PL
dc.subjectintravenouspl_PL
dc.subjectpropofolpl_PL
dc.subjectmidazolampl_PL
dc.subjectreading impairmentpl_PL
dc.subjectphonologypl_PL
dc.subjectpsychologypl_PL
dc.titleNon-word reading test vs anaesthesia. How do anaesthetised patients decode the contents without referring to the meaning?pl_PL
dc.typearticlepl_PL
Files for this record
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name: Non-word reading test vs anaesthesia. How do anaesthetised patients decode the contents without referring to the meaning.pdf
Size: 143.09 KB
Format: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License files
Name: license.txt
Size: 222 B
Format: Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Belongs to collection
Artykuły / Articles