Is the forcing of services on suppliers an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08)

dc.contributor.author	Piszcz, Anna
dc.contributor.organization	Faculty of Law, University of Białystok	en
dc.date.accessioned	2011-07-24T18:39:32Z
dc.date.available	2011-07-24T18:39:32Z
dc.date.issued	2010
dc.description.abstract	In the decision RPZ 21/2005 issued on 21 July 2005, the UOKiK President established an infringement of Article 8(2)(5) and (1) of the Act of 15 December 2000 on Competition and Consumer Protection (hereafter, Competition Act 2000) by the poultry producer DROP S.A. (hereafter, DROP). DROP was found to have abused its dominant position in the purchase markets of duck hatching eggs and goose hatching eggs. The competition authority identified abuses in the form of: − counteracting the formation of conditions necessary for the emergence or development of competition (in this case – in the veterinary services market), and − the imposition of unfair trading conditions.	en
dc.description.eperson	Michał Mijal
dc.identifier.uri	https://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/99
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	Center for Antitrust and Regulatory Studies	en
dc.rights	Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska	pl_PL
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/
dc.subject	polish supreme court case comment	en
dc.subject	forcing of services	en
dc.subject	dominant position	en
dc.title	Is the forcing of services on suppliers an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08)	en
dc.type	article	en

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:	Piszcz - Is the forcing of services on suppliers an abuse of a dominant position.pdf
Size:	229.04 KB
Format:	Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Download

Name:	license.txt
Size:	597 B
Format:	Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Download