Quo vadis, Russia? On the Country's Recent Approach Towards Implementing Judgments of European Court of Human Rights.

Full item record

dc.contributor.authorGórski, Michał
dc.contributor.organizationJagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-27T21:16:21Z
dc.date.available2018-04-27T21:16:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe article analyses the recent approach of the Russian Constitutional Court towards execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, with special focus on its most recent jurisprudence, including the 2017 verdict related to the case of OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia. Subsequently, it discusses whether such an approach is yet another example of “judicial dialogue” between domestic and international courts, or whether it is of more specific character, aiming at undermining the general authority of the ECHR.en
dc.identifier.doi10.12775/CLR.2017.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/15213
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Naukowe UMK
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek*
dc.subjectRussian Constitutional Courten
dc.subjectjudicial dialogueen
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Human Rightsen
dc.subjectdomestic and international lawen
dc.subjectYukos caseen
dc.subjectOAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v.Russiaen
dc.titleQuo vadis, Russia? On the Country's Recent Approach Towards Implementing Judgments of European Court of Human Rights.en
dc.typearticleen
Files for this record
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name: Quo Vadis Russia.pdf
Size: 380.48 KB
Format: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License files
Name: license.txt
Size: 228 B
Format: Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Belongs to collection