How Theoretically Opposite Models of Interethnic Power-Sharing Can Complement Each Other and Contribute to Political Stabilization: The Case of Nigeria

Simple item record

Full item record

dc.contributor.authorTrzciński, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.organizationInstytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PANen
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-02T18:33:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-02T18:33:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionThis article was written as part of project no. 2014/15/B/HS5/01174, entitled Centripetalism as a Model of Political System for Multi -Ethnic States: Comparative Analysis of Two Cases, financed by the National Science Centre, Poland.en
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to demonstrate the thesis that the stabilization of Nigeria’s complicated political situation is furthered by the functioning in that country of institutions based on two models of interethnic power-sharing – consociationalism and centripetalism – and that the two are to some extent complementary in Nigerian practice, despite the fact that political theory sees the two as opposites of each other. The article begins with a short analysis of the political situation in Nigeria. This is followed by a presentation of the problem of defining the notion of political stability and an assessment of the same in the Nigerian context. The article then goes on to discuss the nature of centripetalism and consociationalism and specific centripetal and consociational institutions involved in the stabilization of the political situation in Nigeria. The article ends with the author’s conclusions about the initial thesis. This article has been published in "Politeja" 2016, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 53-73.en
dc.identifier.citationTrzciński, Krzysztof. "How Theoretically Opposite Models of Interethnic Power-Sharing Can Complement Each Other and Contribute to Political Stabilization: The Case of Nigeria." Politeja 42, no. 3 (2016): 53-73. DOI: 10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.42.05.en
dc.identifier.doi10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.42.05
dc.identifier.issn1733-6716
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/18442
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFaculty of International and Political Studies of the Jagiellonian Universityen
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectpower sharingen
dc.subjectpower-sharingen
dc.subjecthybrid power sharingen
dc.subjecthybrid power-sharingen
dc.subjectconsociationalismen
dc.subjectconsociationalen
dc.subjectconsociationen
dc.subjectcentripetalen
dc.subjectcentripetalismen
dc.subjectpolitical scienceen
dc.subjectpolitical stabilityen
dc.subjectpolitical islamen
dc.subjectpoliticsen
dc.subjectpolitics in Nigeriaen
dc.subjectconflict managementen
dc.subjectconflict resolutionen
dc.subjectconflicts in Nigeriaen
dc.subjectpolitical parties in Nigeriaen
dc.subjectcentripetal federalismen
dc.subjectfederalism in Nigeriaen
dc.subjectethnic conflicten
dc.subjectreligious conflicten
dc.subjectethnic politicsen
dc.subjectethnicityen
dc.subjectNiger Deltaen
dc.subjectNigeriaen
dc.subjectBiafraen
dc.subjectNigerian historyen
dc.subjectNigerian civil waren
dc.subjectNigerian political systemen
dc.subjectinterethnic power sharingen
dc.subjectinterethnic power-sharingen
dc.subjectBiafran waren
dc.titleHow Theoretically Opposite Models of Interethnic Power-Sharing Can Complement Each Other and Contribute to Political Stabilization: The Case of Nigeriaen
dc.typearticleen
Files for this record
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name: How_Theoretically_Opposite_Models.pdf
Size: 239 KB
Format: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License files
Name: license.txt
Size: 792 B
Format: Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Name: license_rdf
Size: 1.01 KB
Format: RDF serialized in XML
Description:
Download
Belongs to collection
Artykuły / Articles