2010 and 2011 EU Competition Law and Sector-specific Regulatory Jurisprudence and Case Law Developments with a Nexus to Poland

Simple item record

Full item record

dc.contributor.authorKuik, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.authorMościbroda, Anna
dc.contributor.organizationEuropean Commission (DG Competition)en
dc.contributor.organizationVrije Universiteit, Brussels
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-21T15:00:24Z
dc.date.available2013-07-21T15:00:24Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.descriptionThe views expressed in this overview are personal and do not necessarily represent the position of the European Commission
dc.description.abstractThis third overview of EU competition and sector-specific regulatory jurisprudential and case law developments with a nexus to Poland covers the years 2010 and 2011. This period of time is worth noting for several reasons. First, EU courts delivered a significant number of judgments in ‘Polish’ cases including an increased number of preliminary rulings. Second, 2010-2011 developments were dominated by judgments and decisions concerning telecoms. Finally, the Commission adopted only a handful of Polish State aid decisions following a formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU. The main developments in telecoms relate to the Court of Justice’s preliminary reference judgment in Tele 2 Polska focusing on the interpretation of Regulation 1/2003 and the PTC v UKE ruling that dealt with number portability charges. Relevant is also the antitrust prohibition decision issued by the Commission against Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. for its refusal to grant access to its wholesale broadband services. In other fields, the Court of Justice delivered three State aid judgments (including two appeals against pre-2010 judgments of the General Court) and two judgments in infringement proceedings (regarding pre EU Accession marketing authorisations for medicines and the reutilisation of data from the public sector). The General Court ruled on appeal in the butadiene rubber cartel case (e.g. in Trade-Stomil v Commission). Finally, the Commission dealt with a merger case with a truly Polish specificity (Kraft Foods/ Cadbury), approved subject to divestiture of the E. Wedel brand.en
dc.description.epersonMichał Mijal
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/2088
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCenter for Antitrust and Regulatory Studiesen
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polskapl_PL
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/pl/
dc.subjectElectronic Communications Frameworken
dc.subjectpreliminary rulingen
dc.subjectinfringementen
dc.subjectregulatory casesen
dc.subjectcase lawen
dc.subjectmerger controlen
dc.subjectstate aiden
dc.subjectCommission decisionen
dc.subjectcompetition lawen
dc.subjectcartelen
dc.subjectantitrusten
dc.subjectpharmaceuticalsen
dc.subjecttelecommunicationen
dc.title2010 and 2011 EU Competition Law and Sector-specific Regulatory Jurisprudence and Case Law Developments with a Nexus to Polanden
dc.typearticleen
Files for this record
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name: 2010 and 2011 EU Competition Law and Case Law Developments with a Nexus to Poland.pdf
Size: 305.33 KB
Format: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License files
Name: license.txt
Size: 234 B
Format: Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Belongs to collection
Artykuły / Articles