The Centripetal Spatial Vote Distribution Requirement in Presidential Elections: Cases of Nigeria and Indonesia
Abstract
The principal aim of this article is to explain the specificity of the requirement for the spatial distribution of votes in presidential elections – an institution that has existed in Nigeria since 1979 and in Indonesia since 2001. It also seeks to describe the political conditions which contributed to that institution’s introduction and functioning in those two countries. The article will end with a comparison between the two cases, including a discussion of the present differences between them. The article will also contain a preliminary appraisal of whether the existence of the requirement in question is helping to reduce the level of conflictive behavior in relations between ethnic groups in the multi-ethnic societies of Nigeria and Indonesia. This article has been published in "Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia" 2017, Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 89-107.
Description
Keywords
power sharing consociationalism consociation centripetalism centripetal geographic distribution requirement for presidential election territorial distribution of votes spatial distribution of votes geographic distribution of votes hybrid power-sharing presidential election consociational political authority distribution requirement distribution requirements distribution requirement for presidential elections geographical distribution requirement Nigeria Indonesia territorial vote distribution requirements geo-spatial vote distribution presidentialism presidential system presidential system of government Kenya territorial distribution of votes in elections
Citation
Trzciński, Krzysztof. "The Centripetal Spatial Vote Distribution Requirement in Presidential Elections: Cases of Nigeria and Indonesia." Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia 30, no. 1 (2017): 89-107.