Determining the value of standing timber for harvest planning optimization

Full item record

dc.contributor.authorZaborski, Karol
dc.contributor.authorBanaś, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKożuch, Anna
dc.contributor.organizationMarcule Forest District; Marculeen
dc.contributor.organizationUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Managementen
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-19T13:41:12Z
dc.date.available2021-01-19T13:41:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-15
dc.description.abstractForest managers conducting sustainable forest management are guided by the principles of sustainable use of natural resources, which involve the need for long and short-term planning in organizational units of the State Forests. Plans often differ from reality by the time individual treatments and cuts are to be performed. For economic reasons, it is important to optimize harvest planning, not only focusing on the volume of timber to be harvested, but also the price differences of individual tree species and sort types of wood. The purpose of this study was to present methods evaluating standing timber and to assess their usefulness in optimizing the harvest volume using linear programming. Stands designated to be cut were evaluated using transaction value methods, i.e. “the stumpage value method” M1, the “consumption value” method M2, as well as the net present value (NPV) method M3. The research material was obtained from the State Forests Information System (SILP) for the Marcule Forest District covering the years 2014-2018. The stand values were determined at the beginning and end of the 10-year planning period. We observed that the stand value (standing timber) differed significantly between method M2 as compared to method M1. The value of stands determined by method M3, on the other hand, decreased as the discount rate increased. In the process of optimizing the selection of stands for felling, economic criteria should also be taken into account and this is a direct measure of obtainable standing timber in terms of the cutting possibility in the given planning period. In stands where one species dominates, a simplified method of determining the value (M1) can be used, whereas in stands with significant species diversity, method M2 provides a significantly more accurate value for the cutting timber. However, if harvest volume optimization using linear programming methods is to take longer time periods into account, e.g. 30 years (three 10-year economic planning periods), the most reasonable method for determining the value of stands is the net present value method M3.en
dc.identifier.citationZaborski, K., Banaś, J., & Kożuch, A. (2020). Determining the value of standing timber for harvest planning optimization, Forest Research Papers, 81(2), 65-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2020-0007en
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/frp-2020-0007
dc.identifier.issn2082-8926
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/19428
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstytut Badawczy Lesnictwa (Forest Research Institute), Sękocin Stary, Polanden
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectforest valuationen
dc.subjectharvest planningen
dc.subjectstumpage valueen
dc.subjectnet present valueen
dc.subjectconsumption valueen
dc.titleDetermining the value of standing timber for harvest planning optimizationen
dc.title.alternativeOkreślanie wartości surowca drzewnego drzewostanów w procesie optymalizacji użytkowania rębnegopl
dc.typearticleen
Files for this record
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name: doi-10-2478-frp-2020-0007 en.pdf
Size: 196.93 KB
Format: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License files
Name: license.txt
Size: 481 B
Format: Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Name: license_rdf
Size: 810 B
Format: RDF serialized in XML
Description:
Belongs to collection