Czy grozi nam kryzys prawa? Rozważania na tle problemu tzw. roszczenia do słuszności

Simple item record

Full item record

dc.contributor.authorSkuczyński, Paweł
dc.contributor.organizationUniwersytet Warszawskipl_PL
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-24T09:31:12Z
dc.date.available2017-01-24T09:31:12Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractWhat is usually acknowledged as a topicality indication of Gustav Radbruch’s legal philosophy is the theoretical interest in and practical application of his ideas – known as the Radbruch’s formula – on abominable law, statutory non-law and the refusal to apply it by public authorities, the judiciary in particular. The article main argument is that we can point to other than Radbruch’s formula elements in his philosophy of law which are still applicable and present in the recent discussion on the concept of law itself, its validity and application. What this means is basic to Radbruch’s thought the distinction between the concept of law (Rechtsbegriff), the idea of law (Rechtsidee) and the relationship between the two. The solution accepted by Radbruch in this matter is very broadly applied by the representatives of the nonpositivist concept of law. However, the solution may be ascribed a more general meaning, which manifests itself in the ‘claim to correctness problem’ (Anspruch auf Richtigkeit). Such a claim has to be an element not only of law itself but also of all legal statements including acts of applying the law. The point iendavour to defend is that out of the three interpretations of the claim to correctness problem, the one which refers not only to the correctness of legal order and law application acts, but also to lawyers’ professional obligations and responsibility is the best justified. This is because such a view most fully addresses the challenges of modern law, which has become increasingly professional in character, but on the other hand more prone to factors typical to fully professionalised walks of life – to critical factors especially. The question of how much the interpretation is compatible with Radbruch’s perspective, is beyond the scope of this analysis. However, some arguments suggesting higher degree of concordance will be presented.pl_PL
dc.description.epersonPaweł Skuczyński
dc.identifier.citationSkuczyński, P. (2011). Czy grozi nam kryzys prawa? Rozważania na tle problemu tzw. roszczenia do słuszności. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2(3), 61-75.pl
dc.identifier.issn2082-3304
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/11310
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherStowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej – Sekcja Polska IVRpl
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek
dc.subjectodpowiedzialność moralnapl_PL
dc.subjectkryzys prawapl_PL
dc.subjectroszczenie do słusznościpl_PL
dc.subjectKarl-Otto Apelpl_PL
dc.subjectHabermaspl_PL
dc.subjectGustav Radbruchpl_PL
dc.subjectRadbruchpl_PL
dc.subjectJürgen Habermaspl
dc.subjectApelpl
dc.subjectRobert Alexypl
dc.subjectAlexypl
dc.titleCzy grozi nam kryzys prawa? Rozważania na tle problemu tzw. roszczenia do słusznościpl_PL
dc.typearticlepl_PL
Files for this record
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name: Czy_grozi_nam_kryzys_prawa_Rozważania_na_tle_problemu_tzw_roszczenia_do_słuszności.pdf
Size: 199.08 KB
Format: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License files
Name: license.txt
Size: 228 B
Format: Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Belongs to collection
Artykuły / Articles